?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

American Anansi Godboys

Neil Gaiman likes writing about myth. As an almost inevitable side-effect, he also likes writing about things that have a mythic quality, which, as in "American Gods", sometimes mean that the events he writes about are on a mythic scale, as well.

"American Gods", then, suffered from being written on a scale too grand to be something this reader could empathize with. Too often, Gaiman relied on "pain beyond human imagination" and other hyperbolic devices to try and conjure a story on a vast and cosmic scale. The problem with writing about anything that is beyond human imagination, or indeed, anything ineffable at all, is that it also defies description, which leaves the reader with a less-than-concrete mental image of what's going on. If Shadow's (the Main character in "American Gods") pain is beyond human imagination, and I am in fact human (something subject to debate) then that leaves me reading several pages of description of something I can neither imagine nor picture. Once or twice this isn't a big deal, but it seems to crop up a lot in "American Gods".

Not so "Ananansi Boys". Like "American Gods", "Anansi Boys" is about the relationship the main character has with his missing father who also happens to be a deity. In this case, though, the story is more thoroughly grounded in the experience of Fat Charlie Nancy, the son of Anansi, the African trickster-spider-story-god. Due to a clever twist in the plot, Fat Charlie is not only just as mortal as the rest of us, he's even more painfully hum-drum and perpetually embarassed as most of us. The plot really starts with his father's death, and the subsequent revalations and travails that would naturally be the legacy of a trickster god.

Neil Gaiman really likes writing about the half-mortal sons of trickster gods, doesn't he? But in this case, he does it very well. Fat Charlie is intensely likeable, and he is surrounded by a cast of likeable characters around him. At no point, no matter how far out and mythical Fat Charlie's experiences may be, does the scope escape human understanding. The plot is as twisty as one of Anansi's tricks, but much as a spider's web comes together at the center, "Anansi Boys" comes together in a masterful tying-up-of-loose-ends. Seemingly disparate plot elements come together in a climax that is very satisfying, and only occasionally goosed along by outright coincidence. Gaiman is getting better, the more he writes. It's interesting to see him perfect his craft. There were even a few of those, "Dang! I wish I had thought of that!" moments that any writer (me, allegedly) has when he's reading something well done by another author.

Not everything is letter-perfect, however. Particularly, quite a bit of the dialogue is written in what is supposed to be African-American (of Caribbean extract) vernacular. Neil Gaiman is painfully white and painfully British, however - and in some cases, his African-American characters use British slang that you simply would not hear in the U.S. His ear for dialect is far better when he's writing about citizens of the UK.

I really enjoyed "Anansi Boys" and recommend it to anyone who likes the genre. I plowed through it in a couple of days, and wished it had gone on longer. I was left feeling a little cold by "American Gods", but am glad to see some of the same themes revisited in a better book, written by an author who is more skilled than he used to be. I hold out much hope for Gaiman's next book.

Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
tessama
Oct. 11th, 2005 01:57 am (UTC)
I actually really enjoyed "American Gods." I'll see if I can't pick up "Anansi Boys" in the near future.
pookahchu
Oct. 11th, 2005 05:44 am (UTC)
I found american gods very intruiging, albeit a little dry with patches of stunted text.

I look forward to da "boyz!"
cocomaan
Oct. 13th, 2005 10:29 pm (UTC)
I enjoyed American Gods mainly because I found Shadow to be so... unusual for a protagonist. Very mysterious, very ambiguous, very creepy. The book itself was alright, I suppose. Kind of predictable. I loved Neverwhere, the one about the London Underground. THAT was cool, especially the angel.
skip_chieftain
Oct. 17th, 2005 05:51 pm (UTC)
:-(
Damn you! I didn't know that Fat Charlie's father was a god! :-(

metzhead and I were at the reading at Noreascon 4 - were you there? I experienced side-splitting laughter and Mike enjoyed it just as much. :-)
aghrivaine
Oct. 17th, 2005 05:52 pm (UTC)
Re: :-(
Huh, the thing about Fat Charlie's dad is on the book jacket... so it's not much of a spoiler. I'm not owning up to that one - I'm always careful of spoilers.
skip_chieftain
Oct. 17th, 2005 06:10 pm (UTC)
Re: :-(
huh.... okay

funny though because I was just in Barnes & Noble on Saturday looking at the book and didn't see that
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

monkey pirate
aghrivaine
Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash: Pick Two
My Yelp Reviews.

Latest Month

June 2018
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Paulina Bozek